The Role of Law in Social Change: A Study of Legal Development and Cultural Transformation

Авторы

  • Risky Waluyo Jaty Автор
  • Ami Rulloh Автор
  • Saif Ali Bavana Автор

Ключевые слова:

Cultural Transformation, Law and Society, Legal Consciousness, Legal Culture, Legal Development, Social Change, Socio-Legal Studies

Аннотация

The relationship between law and social change has long occupied a central place in socio-legal scholarship, yet persistent theoretical fragmentation limits understanding of how legal development and cultural transformation mutually constitute one another. While instrumentalist accounts portray law as a top-down engine of social engineering, culturalist perspectives emphasize the embeddedness of legal norms within pre-existing social orders, often underestimating law’s transformative potential. This study addresses the gap by constructing an integrated conceptual framework that captures the bidirectional, recursive interaction between legal change and cultural transformation, moving beyond the unidirectional debate. Employing a qualitative socio-legal methodology, the article synthesizes theoretical insights from classical sociology of law and contemporary empirical studies, and applies them to a comparative analysis of illustrative legal developments across gender equality, LGBTQ+ rights, environmental protection, and anti-discrimination law in jurisdictions including India, South Africa, the United States, and Europe. The findings reveal that law operates not simply as an external force acting upon culture, but as a site of cultural contestation where normative meanings are negotiated, displaced, and re-inscribed. Legal development triggers cultural transformation most effectively when it aligns with latent normative shifts, mobilizes interpretive communities, and generates iterative feedback loops between formal and informal norm systems. Conversely, legal interventions that ignore cultural pluralism or lack institutional support frequently produce backlash, symbolic compliance, or legal alienation. The study contributes a multi-level model of legal-cultural interplay that illuminates the conditions under which law catalyzes sustainable social transformation, and offers actionable insights for legislative design, judicial strategy, and civil society advocacy in culturally diverse societies.

Скачивания

Данные по скачиваниям пока не доступны.

Библиографические ссылки

Agnes, F. (2011). Law and gender inequality: The politics of women’s rights in India. Oxford University Press.

Artz, L., & Meer, T. (2018). Gender-based violence and the law in South Africa. In C. Clark, M. McGarry, & S. A. Phillips (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of gender and violence (pp. 277–296). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58838-4_14

Banakar, R., & Travers, M. (2005). Theory and method in socio-legal research. Hart Publishing.

Bell, D. A. (1980). Brown v. Board of Education and the interest-convergence dilemma. Harvard Law Review, 93 (3), 518–533. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340546

Berger, J. (2008). Litigating for social justice in post-apartheid South Africa: A focus on health and education. In V. Gauri & D. M. Brinks (Eds.), Courting social justice: Judicial enforcement of social and economic rights in the developing world (pp. 38–99). Cambridge University Press.

Bishai, D. M., & Siegel, M. (2007). The effect of state-level motorcycle helmet laws on motorcycle fatalities. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39 (4), 835–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.12.007

Bonilla Maldonado, D. (2015). Constitutionalism of the Global South: The activist tribunals of India, South Africa, and Colombia. Cambridge University Press.

Chambliss, E. (2008). When do facts persuade? Some thoughts on the method of socio-legal research. Law & Society Review, 42 (2), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2008.00341.x

Chua, L. J. (2015). The vernacular mobilization of human rights in Myanmar’s sexual orientation and gender identity movement. Law & Society Review, 49 (2), 299–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12133

Claassens, A., & Ngubane, S. (2008). Women, land and power: The impact of the Communal Land Rights Act. In A. Claassens & B. Cousins (Eds.), Land, power and custom: Controversies generated by South Africa’s Communal Land Rights Act (pp. 154–183). UCT Press.

Crenshaw, K. (1988). Race, reform, and retrenchment: Transformation and legitimation in antidiscrimination law. Harvard Law Review, 101 (7), 1331–1387. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341398

Deshpande, A. (2011). The grammar of caste: Economic discrimination in contemporary India. Oxford University Press.

Dror, Y. (1959). Law and social change. Tulane Law Review, 33, 787–802.

Durkheim, É. (2014). The division of labor in society (W. D. Halls, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1893)

Engel, D. M., & Munger, F. W. (2003). Rights of inclusion: Law and identity in the life stories of Americans with disabilities. University of Chicago Press.

Epp, C. R. (2009). Making rights real: Activists, bureaucrats, and the creation of the legalistic state. University of Chicago Press.

Frank, J. (1930). Law and the modern mind. Brentano’s.

Friedman, L. M. (2005). A history of American law (3rd ed.). Simon & Schuster.

Galanter, M. (1974). Why the “haves” come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change. Law & Society Review, 9 (1), 95–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053023

Galanter, M. (1984). Competing equalities: Law and the backward classes in India. University of California Press.

Gill, G. N. (2017). Environmental justice in India: The National Green Tribunal. Routledge.

Greenhouse, L., & Siegel, R. B. (2011). Before (and after) Roe v. Wade: New questions about backlash. Yale Law Journal, 120 (8), 2028–2087.

Hasan, Z. (2019). Gender, religion and law: The politics of Muslim personal law reform in India. Third World Quarterly, 40 (7), 1322–1338. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2019.1570828

Hertogh, M. (2018). Nobody’s law: Legal consciousness and legal alienation in everyday life. Palgrave Macmillan.

Heywood, M. (2009). South Africa’s Treatment Action Campaign: Combining law and social mobilization to realize the right to health. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 1 (1), 14–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/hun006

Hilson, C. (2002). New social movements: The role of legal opportunity. Journal of European Public Policy, 9 (2), 238–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110120246

Jaising, I., & Sathe, M. (2013). Human rights practice in India: The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Human Rights Law Network.

Keck, T. M. (2009). Beyond backlash: Assessing the impact of judicial decisions on LGBT rights. Law & Society Review, 43 (1), 151–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00371.x

Klarman, M. J. (2004). From Jim Crow to civil rights: The Supreme Court and the struggle for racial equality. Oxford University Press.

Kumar, A. (2021). After Navtej Singh Johar: Decriminalization and the politics of LGBT rights in India. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 18 (2), 364–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-020-00465-3

Liebenberg, S. (2010). Socio-economic rights: Adjudication under a transformative constitution. Juta.

MacKinnon, C. A. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Harvard University Press.

McAdams, R. H. (2015). The expressive powers of law: Theories and limits. Harvard University Press.

McCann, M. W. (1994). Rights at work: Pay equity reform and the politics of legal mobilization. University of Chicago Press.

Merry, S. E. (1988). Legal pluralism. Law & Society Review, 22 (5), 869–896. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638

Merry, S. E. (2000). Colonizing Hawai‘i: The cultural power of law. Princeton University Press.

Merry, S. E. (2006). Transnational human rights and local activism: Mapping the middle. American Anthropologist, 108 (1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2006.108.1.38

Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, *3*(5), 672–682. https://doi.org/10.2307/2084686

Pashukanis, E. B. (2002). The general theory of law and Marxism (B. Einhorn, Trans.). Transaction Publishers. (Original work published 1924)

Pound, R. (1910). Law in books and law in action. American Law Review, 44, 12–36.

Pound, R. (1942). Social control through law. Yale University Press.

Roldán Ortega, R. (2009). Indigenous peoples of Colombia and the law: A critical approach. Tercer Mundo Editores.

Rosenberg, G. N. (1991). The hollow hope: Can courts bring about social change? University of Chicago Press.

Sahu, G. (2014). Public interest environmental litigation in India: Contributions and complications. Indian Journal of Environmental Law, 5 (1), 1–26.

Scheingold, S. A. (1974). The politics of rights: Lawyers, public policy, and political change. Yale University Press.

Schrad, M. L. (2021). Smashing the liquor machine: A global history of prohibition. Oxford University Press.

Sezgin, Y. (2013). Human rights under state-enforced religious family laws in Israel, Egypt and India. Cambridge University Press.

Shah, G., Mander, H., Thorat, S., Deshpande, S., & Baviskar, A. (2006). Untouchability in rural India. Sage Publications.

Sieder, R. (Ed.). (2017). Demanding justice and security: Indigenous women and legal pluralities in Latin America. Rutgers University Press.

Smart, C. (1989). Feminism and the power of law. Routledge.

Sunstein, C. R. (1996). On the expressive function of law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 144 (5), 2021–2053. https://doi.org/10.2307/3312647

Tankard, M. E., & Paluck, E. L. (2017). The effect of a Supreme Court decision on social norms regarding gay marriage. Psychological Science, 28 (9), 1334–1344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617709594

Trubek, D. M., & Galanter, M. (1974). Scholars in self-estrangement: Some reflections on the crisis in law and development studies in the United States. Wisconsin Law Review, 1974 (4), 1062–1102.

Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.

Unger, R. M. (1983). The critical legal studies movement. Harvard Law Review, *96*(3), 561–675. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340896

Vatuk, S. (2017). Marriage and its discontents: Women, Islam and the law in India. Women Unlimited.

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). University of California Press. (Original work published 1922)

Williams, R. V. (2006). Postcolonial politics and personal laws: Colonial legal legacies and the Indian state. Oxford University Press.

Ziegler, M. (2020). Abortion and the law in America: Roe v. Wade to the present. Cambridge University Press.

Опубликован

2024-06-03